Dispelling solar energy myths: Fact vs. fiction – The Times of Northwest Indiana
In the midst of our community’s ongoing discussions about economic development and solar energy, I often hear comments suggesting that these projects will bring more harm than good.
With so much changing suddenly around here, it’s only natural for concerns to arise. I know and respect everyone’s opinions, but believe it is best to base such decisions on facts. So I decided to look at some recent research that examined how solar projects impact their communities. Based on this research and my own observations of the solar projects underway in our community, I feel it is important to point out the research-based facts that dispel many of the negative claims circling in the communities.
False claim: Solar projects negatively impact biodiversity.
Fact: Large-scale solar projects actually sustain and increase natural biodiversity. The shade provided by solar panels enhances floral abundance, attracting more insects, pollinators, and bird species. This added shade also prevents soil moisture loss, boosting plant growth and diversity according to a 2018 study by First Solar. Solar developers often invest in habitat restoration once solar projects are installed and after a project’s lifespan.
People are also reading…
False claim: Solar energy is more expensive than fossil fuels and completely dependent on subsidies.
Fact: The unsubsidized cost of utility-scale solar was $60 per MWh according to a 2023 study conducted by Lazard Asset Management, while the mean unsubsidized cost of gas was $70 per MWh and $117 per MWh when it comes to coal. Solar accounted for only 33% of total renewable energy subsidies in 2022, totaling $7.4 billion according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. At the moment, solar accounts for more subsidies, in the same year, while the coal and gas industries received $2.1 billion in federal subsidies. Even when considering government subsidies, subsidized and unsubsidized solar remains the cheaper form of energy production compared to coal and gas at their most cost-competitive peaks.
False claim: The value of properties decrease when near solar projects.
Fact: Research indicates that solar panels may either maintain or increase property values. For instance, a 2018 investigation on solar projects in Indiana and Illinois concluded that neighboring properties showed “no consistent negative impact” attributable to their proximity to the solar installations. Some researchers even found that properties close to solar projects sold for a slightly higher average compared to properties not near any solar farms.
False claim: Solar projects are harmful to human health.
Fact: According to a recent study by North Carolina State University, the electromagnetic fields generated at solar projects are comparable in strength to those of household appliances like toaster ovens. They pose no risk of negative health impacts.
Solar energy has the potential to be a positive game-changer for Indiana if we give it the appropriate opportunity. The advantages extend far beyond electricity generation. Its cost-effectiveness is unmatched, allowing us to diversify our energy portfolio, fortify our grid against disruptions, and reduce the burden of electric bills for residents and businesses alike. Moreover, the adoption of solar power promotes environmental sustainability by improving soil conditions and ensuring a healthier ecosystem for future generations to thrive.
We’ve got a new neighbor in solar energy and we should treat them as such.
Jacob Everett is a certified economic developer and founder of the Indianapolis based renewable energy advisory firm Corsa Strategies.
#lee-rev-content { margin:0 -5px; }
#lee-rev-content h3 {
font-family: inherit!important;
font-weight: 700!important;
border-left: 8px solid var(–lee-blox-link-color);
text-indent: 7px;
font-size: 24px!important;
line-height: 24px;
}
#lee-rev-content .rc-provider {
font-family: inherit!important;
}
#lee-rev-content h4 {
line-height: 24px!important;
font-family: “serif-ds”,Times,”Times New Roman”,serif!important;
margin-top: 10px!important;
}
@media (max-width: 991px) {
#lee-rev-content h3 {
font-size: 18px!important;
line-height: 18px;
}
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article {
clear: both;
background-color: #fff;
color: #222;
background-position: bottom;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
padding: 15px 0 20px;
margin-bottom: 40px;
border-top: 4px solid rgba(0,0,0,.8);
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.2);
display: none;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article,
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article p {
font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, “Segoe UI”, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif, “Apple Color Emoji”, “Segoe UI Emoji”, “Segoe UI Symbol”;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article h2 {
font-size: 24px;
margin: 15px 0 5px 0;
font-family: “serif-ds”, Times, “Times New Roman”, serif;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .lead {
margin-bottom: 5px;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .email-desc {
font-size: 16px;
line-height: 20px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
opacity: 0.7;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article form {
padding: 10px 30px 5px 30px;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .disclaimer {
opacity: 0.5;
margin-bottom: 0;
line-height: 100%;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .disclaimer a {
color: #222;
text-decoration: underline;
}
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article .email-hammer {
border-bottom: 3px solid #222;
opacity: .5;
display: inline-block;
padding: 0 10px 5px 10px;
margin-bottom: -5px;
font-size: 16px;
}
@media (max-width: 991px) {
#pu-email-form-breaking-email-article form {
padding: 10px 0 5px 0;
}
}
.grecaptcha-badge { visibility: hidden; }
This post was originally published on 3rd party site mentioned in the title of this site